“The issue is now quite clear. It is between light and darkness and every one must choose his side.” G. K. Chesterton
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Preparing for the Month of the Holy Rosary
October is a special month for Our Lady. With the Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary on October 7 and the commemoration of the Miracle of the Sun by Our Lady of Fatima on October 13, there are many reasons in particular to increase our devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. One particular thing we can do is to say a Rosary every day; if that is already part of our devotional life, we can add another Rosary. With the upcoming election, think about dedicating that extra Rosary for the needs of our country. For more information about October, click on the following link.
Liturgical Year : October, Month of the Holy Rosary - Catholic Culture
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Fabulous post from Simcha Fisher
Hello all, sorry I haven't been on for the last week, but my computer died and it's been with the Geek Squad. But I'm back. Simcha Fisher has another great post over at National Catholic Register. She demolishes the radical turn the pro-choice movement has made, going from saying that abortion is necessary though undesirable to advancing it as a normal and positive event in most women's lives.
Who are the "one in three?" |Blogs | NCRegister.com
Who are the "one in three?" |Blogs | NCRegister.com
Friday, September 21, 2012
7 Quick Takes Friday--1 to 4 from Susan, 5-7 from James
1.
Maggie
and I watched a movie a few weeks ago called The Perfect Family. While
the movie itself was far from perfect, I thought it did do a nice job of
portraying what real families are up against when they try to live out their
faith in a seriously fallen world.
1.
Apparently there is a new sort of Internet scam
going around. The other night, while
Josh was watching a movie on a website, a page popped up telling him that the
site he was watching had violated some copyright law and that the FBI was going
to prosecute him. He could, however,
simply go ahead and pay a fine of $200 to a website they had set up for that
very purpose. Not surprisingly, he panicked, as did I when
I saw it. (James is always warning us to
make sure that any site we use is a legal one).
Fortunately, we checked it out and found that it was just a scam. So,
beware.
1.
This has been the first week in many that I
haven’t had any writing to do and I have to admit that I don’t like it. I find that I get much more done and am even
happier when I have a lot to do. Rest
assured, there are still plenty of things I ought to be doing, its just that I
find I miss an intellectual outlet.
1.
Maggie and Josh are now both baby-sitting every
afternoon, which I find to be delightful.
They are both so good with kids and I find it very encouraging to hope
that they will make excellent parents someday.
I think I posted a while back about a new organization, Catholics Called to Witness. The husband and wife founders, Dr. Manuel and Adriana Gonzalez, were on EWTN Live with Fr. Mitch Pacwa on Wednesday. During the program they played the great video they have featured on the CC2W website, "Test of Fire." If you haven't seen it, here it is.
One of my favorite forms of music growing up was Broadway show tunes. I may be the only heterosexual in America who can say that. My favorite singer was Judy Garland. Again, see previous sentence. Simply because I like the song, here she is singing "The Trolley Song" from Meet Me In Saint Louis.
For more Quick Takes, visit Conversion Diary!
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
We are the 53%!
By now, everyone in the United States, Canada, Europe, and parts of Antarctica have heard about Mitt Romney's statements, secretly recorded and leaked to a left-wing magazine, concerning the dependency of 47% of the American people on some form of government assistance. This dependence, Romney stated, made this 47% unlikely to vote for him. Since this statement, the mainstream in-the-tank-for-Obama media have been heralding this as a major candidacy killing gaffe--one so bad that the campaign might as well be over. We might as well not have an election. We should just declare Obama the winner and go back to watching Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo.
So while the media is eulogizing the "late" Romney campaign, no one is asking the obvious question.
What exactly is wrong with what Romney said?
It certainly is not the truth of what he said. While a broad brush statement, in general Romney hit the nail on the head, as this Wall Street Journal article pointed out.
So if the furor is not because what Romney said was wrong, could it be because what Romney said was right? I think the answer is yes. Romney incurred the wrath of the media and the left because he took the class warfare argument Obama has been using for years and turned it on its head.
What do I mean? Let me explain. For the last couple of years, since the Occupy movement popularized the notion of the 99% against the 1%--the latter being the rich members of our society. The vision is that the 99% of average Americans are exploited by a small wealthy elite. Obama has taken this and incorporated it into his campaign against Romney. With Romney's comments, however, people have another vision to consider--a growing group of people who do not pay taxes, who rely on some form of government assistance, supported by a steadily shrinking percentage of Americans. Romney's description is much more supportable by the evidence than the Obama/Occupy perspective.
Obama is the candidate of the 47%. He is the candidate of dependency. He is the candidate of victimhood. He is the candidate of irresponsibility. He is the candidate of the handout.
Romney is the candidate of the 53%. He is the candidate of independence. He is the candidate of possibilities. He is the candidate of personal responsibility. He is the candidate of the hand-up.
Let us stand up and say proudly--WE ARE THE 53%!
So while the media is eulogizing the "late" Romney campaign, no one is asking the obvious question.
What exactly is wrong with what Romney said?
It certainly is not the truth of what he said. While a broad brush statement, in general Romney hit the nail on the head, as this Wall Street Journal article pointed out.
So if the furor is not because what Romney said was wrong, could it be because what Romney said was right? I think the answer is yes. Romney incurred the wrath of the media and the left because he took the class warfare argument Obama has been using for years and turned it on its head.
What do I mean? Let me explain. For the last couple of years, since the Occupy movement popularized the notion of the 99% against the 1%--the latter being the rich members of our society. The vision is that the 99% of average Americans are exploited by a small wealthy elite. Obama has taken this and incorporated it into his campaign against Romney. With Romney's comments, however, people have another vision to consider--a growing group of people who do not pay taxes, who rely on some form of government assistance, supported by a steadily shrinking percentage of Americans. Romney's description is much more supportable by the evidence than the Obama/Occupy perspective.
Obama is the candidate of the 47%. He is the candidate of dependency. He is the candidate of victimhood. He is the candidate of irresponsibility. He is the candidate of the handout.
Romney is the candidate of the 53%. He is the candidate of independence. He is the candidate of possibilities. He is the candidate of personal responsibility. He is the candidate of the hand-up.
Let us stand up and say proudly--WE ARE THE 53%!
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Wifey Wednesday--The Secret Life of the Woman in the Mantilla, Part 2
Now, what you've all been waiting for...part 2 from Susan:
First, please allow me to
apologize for not getting this finished in a more timely manner. I
trust that the few women who are so gracious as to read this will
understand what I mean when I say, “It been crazy around here.”
I also hope that the extra time I’ve had to ponder all things head
covering will make this post worth the wait.
Before I go on, I want you
to understand that I am not trying to encourage or discourage any
type of head covering. There is plenty of information on that
already available. What I do hope to do is share something of the
story of how my journey through various head covering experiences
mirrors my journey into the Catholic Church.
I think it all began with
the old movies I sometimes saw as a child. In these movies, usually
set in the days before Vatican II, the women wearing mantillas was as
much a symbol of being in a Catholic Church as priests, nuns or
stained glass windows. But to my little Baptist eyes, the lace
scarves that those ladies and even little girls wore symbolized
something much greater. It symbolized holiness and a sort of hushed
devotion to God that I just didn’t see around me in Protestant
circles.
Later, around the time I
graduated from high school, hats came back into fashion and I was
content. However, while the fashion passed, my interest in mantillas
did not. In fact, it grew to that point that, when our family moved
to Maryland, I made the comment to James that I would love to find a
church where the women wore some sort of head covering during the
(Presbyterian) worship service. When we visited the first church of
our list, I was delighted to see doilies springing up around the
auditorium like mushrooms.
Over the next few years I
often spoke with the pastor, and even more often with his wife, about
how central wearing something on one’s head was to a woman’s
proper worship. In fact, the hand full of women who wore doilies on
Sunday were part of a sort of inner circle that also home-schooled,
hosted people for Sunday dinners and even lived together in a certain
neighborhood. They had large, but not too large families, never
traveled on Sundays and would not think of making any decision
without consulting the pastor, who was seen as the ultimate authority
on all things spiritual and temporal.
When we eventually found
ourselves on the wrong side of the pastor’s opinion, we had to
leave. In doing so, we lost all our friends and most of our
acquaintances. I also lost, briefly, my desired to wear a head
covering, as I had come closely associate it with feeling superior
and showing the church which clique I belonged to.
Fortunately, God in his
mercy led us to an Anglican Catholic parish where the priest loved us
back into feeling safe in God’s house. I soon discovered that,
while some women did wear doilies and others didn’t, it wasn’t a
big deal. No one cared, except of course the woman who made it her
mission in life to care about every little detail in the church from
the style of cassocks to the height of the candles. I soon figured
out that she was the authority in this church and began to work very
hard to keep in her good graces.
By this time I was also
thoroughly immersed in the Internet and began to come across more and
more information on women covering their heads during worship. In
fact, it became almost an obsession for me as
I read first one
author, then another, then another. But the problem was that the
more I read, the more confused I became, and the more it seemed that
it was ultimately anyone’s guess. Eventually, I realized that the
same was true for most of what I had learned in my life as a
Protestant.
Well, the priest that we
loved left and with him much most of the life of that little church.
We knew we needed to make a change, and began to consider going to
Rome. However, I still had reservations on certain practices and
doctrines—you know, Mary, the Eucharist, all the usual suspects for
a cradle Protestant. Then one day I was watching EWTN and I heard
something that would change my life. When Christ left the earth and
gave the Great Commission to the 11 Apostles, it wasn’t just about
evangelism, though obviously that was a big part of it. It was also
about authority. He had actually left someone in charge and
laid out how they would continue to perpetuate his teachings on
earth.
I was thrilled and
astounded! Did this really mean that I could stop changing my mind
every time I read something new on the Internet? Could I really
stop trying to figure everything out on my own and rely on the
collective wisdom of 2000 years? I mean, that would really leave me
a lot more time for crocheting and maybe even praying. And if this
applied to head covering (which, by the way, the Church teaches is
optional), what else might it apply to? Capital punishment?
Contraception? Ministering to the poor? Yes, yes and yes.
So
that is my story of how a little Baptist girl who was enchanted by
lace scarves became a grown woman finally resting in the bosom of
knowing that she doesn’t have to figure it all out herself.
Monday, September 17, 2012
Friday, September 14, 2012
7 Quick Takes--Study Helps from St. Thomas Aquinas
The thing I love, love, LOVE to do most in the world (after prayer) is reading and studying. I usually have one or two--or five--books in various stages of completion. Usually, it's a theological or spiritual work, but occasionally I let loose as read something a little lighter (like Chesterton). One of the great things about reverting to the Catholic Church is the almost limitless amount of reading to do.
Studying the faith is absolutely essential. We cannot be dumb Catholics. We must know our faith in order to be able to share it with others when they ask and defend ourselves when attacked. Every Catholic should at least study Scripture and the Catechism on a regular basis. With the Year of Faith fast approaching, and the Holy Father calling on us to re-familiarize ourselves with our Catholic faith through prayerful study, I thought it might be nice to review some advice on how to study from one of the great Doctors of the Church, St. Thomas Aquinas.
LETTER OF THOMAS AQUINAS TO BROTHER JOHN
ON HOW TO STUDY
Since you asked me, my dearest in Christ Brother John, how you should study in order to acquire the treasure of knowledge, I offer you this advice on the matter: Do not wish to jump immediately from the streams to the sea, because one has to go through easier things to the more difficult. Therefore the following points are my warning and your instruction:
- I command you to be slow to speak, and slow to go to the conversation room.
- Embrace purity of conscience.
- Do not give up spending time in prayer.
- Love spending much time in your cell, if you want to be led into the wine cellar.
- Show yourself amiable to all.
- Do not query at all what others are doing.
- Do not be very familiar with anyone, because familiarity breeds contempt, and provides matter for distracting you from study.
- Do not get involved at all in the discussions and affairs of lay people.
- Avoid conversations about all any and every matter.
- Do not fail to imitate the example of good and holy men.
- Do not consider who the person is you are listening to, but whatever good he says commit to memory.
- Whatever you are doing and hearing try to understand. Resolve doubts, and put whatever you can in the storeroom of your mind, like someone wanting to fill a container.
- Do not spend time on things beyond your grasp.
Following such a path, you will bring forth flowers and produce useful fruit for the vinyard of the Lord of Power and Might, as long as you live. If you follow this, you can reach what you desire.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



